M62 Coloproctology Course

Held on 1st-2nd April, the Keynote speaker was Terry Hicks from the USA, Mike Thompson, President of the ACPGBI. Sessions included faecal incontinence, colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease.

Text Size
Mattias Soop, MD PhD

Centre for Gastrointestinal Disease, Ersta Hospital and Centre for Surgical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

M62 Coloproctology Course Huddersfield 1-2 April 2004


The uncomplicated patient

In the uncomplicated surgical patient, the aim of perioperative nutrition is primarily to avoid prolonged semi-starvation rather than to prevent malnutrition. Over the last decade, oral intake of clear fluids hours before surgery and feeding immediately following surgery have been shown not only to be safe but also beneficial. These findings challenge the traditional routines of preoperative overnight fasting and the postoperative reintroduction of oral diet only upon return of bowel function.


Preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment

Oral intake of clear fluids up to two to three hours before anaesthesia has been shown to be

safe in patients with normal gastric emptying1, and is now advocated by most national

anaesthetic professional organisations. For example, The Royal College of Anaesthesia of

England recommends a three-hour interval between intake of clear fluids and anaesthesia2.

Preoperative treatment with a carbohydrate-rich beverage two to three hours before

anaesthesia has been shown to blunt catabolic responses to surgery such as insulin resistance3

and accelerated nitrogen losses4. Preoperative carbohydrate treatment has also been associated

with an attenuation of postoperative muscle weakness5 and a reduction in postoperative

hospital stay6 although these findings remains to be confirmed in larger trials.


Postoperative oral nutrition

Contrary to traditional belief, early (<24 h postop) feeding above a bowel anastomosis has not

been associated with an increased risk of anastomotic dehiscence; indeed there was a near

significant risk reduction in a recent meta-analysis of trials comparing early feeding with late

reintroduction of oral diet after gastrointestinal surgery7. Significant reductions of

postoperative infectious complication rates and lengths of hospital stay were found with early

feeding7. While postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis has traditionally limited early

feeding8, modern perioperative enhanced-recovery protocols including thoracic epidural

analgesia, opioid-sparing analgesia, early mobilization and postoperative laxatives completely

eliminates gastrointestinal paralysis after open colonic resection9, 10. Such protocols thus allow

for immediate postoperative oral intake of significant amounts of nutrients11, making artificial

intravenous or enteral tube feeding superfluous in patients undergoing uncomplicated

colorectal surgery today. Furthermore, enhanced-recovery protocols including preoperative

carbohydrate treatment markedly blunt the catabolic response to surgery and allows for

immediate, complete feeding without hyperglycaemia and with nitrogen balance12.


The malnourished patient


Diagnosing malnutrition before surgery

Approximately 25 % of surgical patients have been reported to be malnourished on

admission13. There is little doubt that malnutrition adversely affects outcome from surgery14,

and it is therefore important to diagnose malnutrition before surgery. A simple and highly

predictive test is the subjective global assessment (SGA), which is based on a careful history

and physical examination15.


Nutritional support in the malnourished surgical patient

Many trials have assessed the efficacy of perioperative nutritional support on outcome in

malnourished patients. There is good evidence that five to ten days of total parenteral nutrition

(TPN) at 30-35 kcal•kg–1•day–1 and 0.16-0.20 g nitrogen•kg–1•day–1 before major abdominal

surgery decreases overall postoperative morbidity in malnourished patients 16-18. Although

similar beneficial effects would be expected from preoperative oral nutritional support in

patients who tolerate it, no trials testing this hypothesis have been reported. Routine TPN in

the postoperative phase, in contrast to preoperative TPN, was reported to significantly

increase postoperative morbidity in a meta-analysis19, perhaps due to access complications20.

However, oral so-called sip feeds supplementing oral diet during the postoperative hospital

stay has been associated with decreased complication rates in mildly malnourished patients

undergoing gastrointestinal surgery21, 22.


The patient with a postoperative complication


Prolonged postoperative ileus

Although postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis can be avoided in most patients after

colorectal surgery with enhanced-recovery protocols9, ileus still occurs in some patients.

Although no data has been reported on the effects of delayed TPN in prolonged postoperative

ileus, an American consensus conference advocates starting TPN after five to ten days of

postoperative ileus19 to avoid prolonged starvation. With modern perioperative care, the

caloric demands after elective surgery are little increased above basal needs; a rough guide is

25-30 kcal•kg–1•day–1 12.


Infectious complications

Serious infectious complications after surgery result in progressively increasing caloric

demands23, aggravated insulin resistance resulting in hyperglycaemia24, and often

gastrointestinal paralysis. The enteral route should be used for total or partial nutritional

support as tolerated25, with additional caloric needs covered via the parenteral route. Most

investigators recommend that caloric supply be tailored to meet measured caloric demands

(indirect calorimetry) with 30–40% of total calories from fat and intakes of

0.15–0.2 g nitrogen•kg–1•day–1. Lacking indirect calorimetry equipment, empiric estimates of

the increases in caloric demands above basal may be used, such as +25 % during the first

week of severe sepsis, and +100 % from the second week23. Treatment of insulin resistance

by aggressive intravenous insulin therapy, keeping blood glucose concentrations at 4.4-

6.1 mmol•l–1, drastically reduces morbidity and mortality in postoperative patients in the

intensive care unit26. Critical illness is one condition where so-called immuno-nutrition may

be beneficial27. Provision of supplemental arginine27 and glutamine28 has been associated with improved outcomes, although this is a field of current controversy.


References

1. Ljungqvist O, Soreide E. Preoperative fasting. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 400-406.

2. Smith A. Preoperative fasting in adults. In Raising the Standard, Lack JA, White LA,

Thomas GM, Rollin A-M (eds). Royal College of Anaesthetists: London, 2000;

http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/docs/section1.pdf [23 February 2004].

3. Soop M, Nygren J, Myrenfors P, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O. Preoperative oral carbohydrate

treatment attenuates immediate postoperative insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol

Metab 2001; 280: E576-583.

4. Crowe P, Dennison A, Royle G. The effect of pre-operative glucose loading on

postoperative nitrogen metabolism. Br J Surg 1984; 71: 635-637.

5. Henriksen MG, Hessov I, Dela F, Vind Hansen H, Haraldsted V, Rodt SA. Effects of

preoperative oral carbohydrates and peptides on postoperative endocrine response,

mobilization, nutrition and muscle function in abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand

2003; 47: 191-199.

6. Ljungqvist O, Nygren J, Thorell A, Brodin U, Efendic S. Preoperative nutrition - elective

surgery in the fed or the overnight fasted state. Clin Nutr 2001; 20 (Suppl 1): 167-171.

7. Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S. Early enteral feeding versus "nil by mouth"

after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Bmj

2001; 323: 773-776.

8. Watters JM, Kirpatrick SM, Norris SB, Shamji FM, Wells GA. Immediate postoperative

enteral feeding results in impaired respiratory mechanics and decreased mobility. Ann Surg

1997; 226: 369-380.

9. Basse L, Madsen JL, Kehlet H. Normal gastrointestinal transit after colonic resection using

epidural analgesia, enforced oral nutrition and laxative. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1498-1500.

10. Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D, Sonne E, Billesbolle P, Hendel HW, et al.

Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical

performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 446-453.

11. Henriksen MG, Hansen HV, Hessov I. Early oral nutrition after elective colorectal

surgery: influence of balanced analgesia and enforced mobilization. Nutrition 2002; 18: 263-

267.

12. Soop M, Carlson G, Hopkinson J, Clarke S, Thorell A, Nygren J, et al. Metabolic effects

of postoperative enteral nutrition in an enhanced-recovery protocol after colorectal surgery.

Clin Nutr 2003; 22: S76.

13. McWhirter JP, Pennington CR. Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital. Bmj

1994; 308: 945-948.

14. Baker JP, Detsky AS, Wesson DE, Wolman SL, Stewart S, Whitewell J, et al. Nutritional

assessment: A comparison of clinical judgement and objective measurements. N Engl J Med

1982; 306: 969-972.

15. Detsky AS, Baker JP, Mendelson RA. Evaluating the accuracy of nutritional assessment

techniques applied to hospitalized patients: Methodology and comparisons. JPEN 1984; 8:

153.

16. Bellantone R, Doglietto G, Bossola M, Pacelli F, Negro F, Sofo L, et al. Preoperative

parenteral nutrition in malnourished surgical patients. Acta Chir Scand 1988; 22: 249-251.

17. Meguid M, Curtas M, Meguid V. Effects of pre-operative TPN on surgical risk -

preliminary status report. Br J Clin Prac 1988; 42(Suppl): 53-58.

18. Moghissi K, Hornshaw J, Teasdale P. Parenteral nutrition in carcinoma of the oesophagus

treated by surgery: nitrogen balance and clinical studies. Br J Surg 1977; 64: 125-128.

19. Klein S, Jinney K, Jeejeebhoy K, Alpers D, Hellertein M, Murray M, et al. Nutrition

support in clinical practice: review of published data and recommendations for future research

directions. JPEN 1997; 21: 133-156.

20. Mughal MM. Complications of intravenous feeding catheters. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 15-21.

21. Rana SK, Bray J, Menzies-Gow N, Jameson J, Payne James JJ, Frost P, et al. Short term

benefits of post-operative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients. Clin Nutr 1992; 11:

337-344.

22. Keele AM, Bray MJ, Emery PW, Duncan HD, Silk DBA. Two phase randomised

controlled clinical trial of postoperative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients. Gut

1997; 40: 393-399.

23. Uehara M, Plank LD, Hill GL. Components of energy expenditure in patients with severe

sepsis and major trauma: a basis for clinical care. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1295-1302.

24. Saeed M, Carlson GL, Little RA, Irving MH. Selective impairment of glucose storage in

human sepsis. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 813-821.

25. Moore FA, Feliciano DV, Andrassy RJ, McArdle AH, Booth FVM, Morgenstein-Wagner

TB, et al. Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic

complications: the result of a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1992; 216: 172-183.

26. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al.

Intensive insulin therapy in the surgical intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1359-

1367.

27. Heyland DK, Novak F, Drover JW, Jain M, Su X, Suchner U. Should immunonutrition

become routine in critically ill patients? JAMA 2001; 286: 944-953.

28. Griffiths RD, Jones C, Palmer TEA. Six-month outcome of critically ill patients given

glutamine-supplemented parenteral nutrition. Nutrition 1997; 13: 295-302

To register fill in the registration form and send it off complete with a cheque to pay for your course.

Course Fee: £240

Mr J Hartley
Consultant Surgeon
Academic Surgical Unit
Castle Hill Hospital
Cottingham
East Yorkshire
HU16 5JQ

Download the PDF Registration form