Held on 1st-2nd April, the Keynote speaker was Terry Hicks from the USA, Mike Thompson, President of the ACPGBI. Sessions included faecal incontinence, colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease.
Centre for Gastrointestinal Disease, Ersta Hospital and Centre for Surgical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
M62 Coloproctology Course Huddersfield 1-2 April 2004
The uncomplicated patient
In the uncomplicated surgical patient, the aim of perioperative nutrition is primarily to avoid prolonged semi-starvation rather than to prevent malnutrition. Over the last decade, oral intake of clear fluids hours before surgery and feeding immediately following surgery have been shown not only to be safe but also beneficial. These findings challenge the traditional routines of preoperative overnight fasting and the postoperative reintroduction of oral diet only upon return of bowel function.
Preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment
Oral intake of clear fluids up to two to three hours before anaesthesia has been shown to be
safe in patients with normal gastric emptying1, and is now advocated by most national
anaesthetic professional organisations. For example, The Royal College of Anaesthesia of
England recommends a three-hour interval between intake of clear fluids and anaesthesia2.
Preoperative treatment with a carbohydrate-rich beverage two to three hours before
anaesthesia has been shown to blunt catabolic responses to surgery such as insulin resistance3
and accelerated nitrogen losses4. Preoperative carbohydrate treatment has also been associated
with an attenuation of postoperative muscle weakness5 and a reduction in postoperative
hospital stay6 although these findings remains to be confirmed in larger trials.
Postoperative oral nutrition
Contrary to traditional belief, early (<24 h postop) feeding above a bowel anastomosis has not
been associated with an increased risk of anastomotic dehiscence; indeed there was a near
significant risk reduction in a recent meta-analysis of trials comparing early feeding with late
reintroduction of oral diet after gastrointestinal surgery7. Significant reductions of
postoperative infectious complication rates and lengths of hospital stay were found with early
feeding7. While postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis has traditionally limited early
feeding8, modern perioperative enhanced-recovery protocols including thoracic epidural
analgesia, opioid-sparing analgesia, early mobilization and postoperative laxatives completely
eliminates gastrointestinal paralysis after open colonic resection9, 10. Such protocols thus allow
for immediate postoperative oral intake of significant amounts of nutrients11, making artificial
intravenous or enteral tube feeding superfluous in patients undergoing uncomplicated
colorectal surgery today. Furthermore, enhanced-recovery protocols including preoperative
carbohydrate treatment markedly blunt the catabolic response to surgery and allows for
immediate, complete feeding without hyperglycaemia and with nitrogen balance12.
The malnourished patient
Diagnosing malnutrition before surgery
Approximately 25 % of surgical patients have been reported to be malnourished on
admission13. There is little doubt that malnutrition adversely affects outcome from surgery14,
and it is therefore important to diagnose malnutrition before surgery. A simple and highly
predictive test is the subjective global assessment (SGA), which is based on a careful history
and physical examination15.
Nutritional support in the malnourished surgical patient
Many trials have assessed the efficacy of perioperative nutritional support on outcome in
malnourished patients. There is good evidence that five to ten days of total parenteral nutrition
(TPN) at 30-35 kcal•kg–1•day–1 and 0.16-0.20 g nitrogen•kg–1•day–1 before major abdominal
surgery decreases overall postoperative morbidity in malnourished patients 16-18. Although
similar beneficial effects would be expected from preoperative oral nutritional support in
patients who tolerate it, no trials testing this hypothesis have been reported. Routine TPN in
the postoperative phase, in contrast to preoperative TPN, was reported to significantly
increase postoperative morbidity in a meta-analysis19, perhaps due to access complications20.
However, oral so-called sip feeds supplementing oral diet during the postoperative hospital
stay has been associated with decreased complication rates in mildly malnourished patients
undergoing gastrointestinal surgery21, 22.
The patient with a postoperative complication
Prolonged postoperative ileus
Although postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis can be avoided in most patients after
colorectal surgery with enhanced-recovery protocols9, ileus still occurs in some patients.
Although no data has been reported on the effects of delayed TPN in prolonged postoperative
ileus, an American consensus conference advocates starting TPN after five to ten days of
postoperative ileus19 to avoid prolonged starvation. With modern perioperative care, the
caloric demands after elective surgery are little increased above basal needs; a rough guide is
25-30 kcal•kg–1•day–1 12.
Infectious complications
Serious infectious complications after surgery result in progressively increasing caloric
demands23, aggravated insulin resistance resulting in hyperglycaemia24, and often
gastrointestinal paralysis. The enteral route should be used for total or partial nutritional
support as tolerated25, with additional caloric needs covered via the parenteral route. Most
investigators recommend that caloric supply be tailored to meet measured caloric demands
(indirect calorimetry) with 30–40% of total calories from fat and intakes of
0.15–0.2 g nitrogen•kg–1•day–1. Lacking indirect calorimetry equipment, empiric estimates of
the increases in caloric demands above basal may be used, such as +25 % during the first
week of severe sepsis, and +100 % from the second week23. Treatment of insulin resistance
by aggressive intravenous insulin therapy, keeping blood glucose concentrations at 4.4-
6.1 mmol•l–1, drastically reduces morbidity and mortality in postoperative patients in the
intensive care unit26. Critical illness is one condition where so-called immuno-nutrition may
be beneficial27. Provision of supplemental arginine27 and glutamine28 has been associated with improved outcomes, although this is a field of current controversy.
References
1. Ljungqvist O, Soreide E. Preoperative fasting. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 400-406.
2. Smith A. Preoperative fasting in adults. In Raising the Standard, Lack JA, White LA,
Thomas GM, Rollin A-M (eds). Royal College of Anaesthetists: London, 2000;
http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/docs/section1.pdf [23 February 2004].
3. Soop M, Nygren J, Myrenfors P, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O. Preoperative oral carbohydrate
treatment attenuates immediate postoperative insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol
Metab 2001; 280: E576-583.
4. Crowe P, Dennison A, Royle G. The effect of pre-operative glucose loading on
postoperative nitrogen metabolism. Br J Surg 1984; 71: 635-637.
5. Henriksen MG, Hessov I, Dela F, Vind Hansen H, Haraldsted V, Rodt SA. Effects of
preoperative oral carbohydrates and peptides on postoperative endocrine response,
mobilization, nutrition and muscle function in abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
2003; 47: 191-199.
6. Ljungqvist O, Nygren J, Thorell A, Brodin U, Efendic S. Preoperative nutrition - elective
surgery in the fed or the overnight fasted state. Clin Nutr 2001; 20 (Suppl 1): 167-171.
7. Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S. Early enteral feeding versus "nil by mouth"
after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Bmj
2001; 323: 773-776.
8. Watters JM, Kirpatrick SM, Norris SB, Shamji FM, Wells GA. Immediate postoperative
enteral feeding results in impaired respiratory mechanics and decreased mobility. Ann Surg
1997; 226: 369-380.
9. Basse L, Madsen JL, Kehlet H. Normal gastrointestinal transit after colonic resection using
epidural analgesia, enforced oral nutrition and laxative. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1498-1500.
10. Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D, Sonne E, Billesbolle P, Hendel HW, et al.
Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical
performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 446-453.
11. Henriksen MG, Hansen HV, Hessov I. Early oral nutrition after elective colorectal
surgery: influence of balanced analgesia and enforced mobilization. Nutrition 2002; 18: 263-
267.
12. Soop M, Carlson G, Hopkinson J, Clarke S, Thorell A, Nygren J, et al. Metabolic effects
of postoperative enteral nutrition in an enhanced-recovery protocol after colorectal surgery.
Clin Nutr 2003; 22: S76.
13. McWhirter JP, Pennington CR. Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital. Bmj
1994; 308: 945-948.
14. Baker JP, Detsky AS, Wesson DE, Wolman SL, Stewart S, Whitewell J, et al. Nutritional
assessment: A comparison of clinical judgement and objective measurements. N Engl J Med
1982; 306: 969-972.
15. Detsky AS, Baker JP, Mendelson RA. Evaluating the accuracy of nutritional assessment
techniques applied to hospitalized patients: Methodology and comparisons. JPEN 1984; 8:
153.
16. Bellantone R, Doglietto G, Bossola M, Pacelli F, Negro F, Sofo L, et al. Preoperative
parenteral nutrition in malnourished surgical patients. Acta Chir Scand 1988; 22: 249-251.
17. Meguid M, Curtas M, Meguid V. Effects of pre-operative TPN on surgical risk -
preliminary status report. Br J Clin Prac 1988; 42(Suppl): 53-58.
18. Moghissi K, Hornshaw J, Teasdale P. Parenteral nutrition in carcinoma of the oesophagus
treated by surgery: nitrogen balance and clinical studies. Br J Surg 1977; 64: 125-128.
19. Klein S, Jinney K, Jeejeebhoy K, Alpers D, Hellertein M, Murray M, et al. Nutrition
support in clinical practice: review of published data and recommendations for future research
directions. JPEN 1997; 21: 133-156.
20. Mughal MM. Complications of intravenous feeding catheters. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 15-21.
21. Rana SK, Bray J, Menzies-Gow N, Jameson J, Payne James JJ, Frost P, et al. Short term
benefits of post-operative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients. Clin Nutr 1992; 11:
337-344.
22. Keele AM, Bray MJ, Emery PW, Duncan HD, Silk DBA. Two phase randomised
controlled clinical trial of postoperative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients. Gut
1997; 40: 393-399.
23. Uehara M, Plank LD, Hill GL. Components of energy expenditure in patients with severe
sepsis and major trauma: a basis for clinical care. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1295-1302.
24. Saeed M, Carlson GL, Little RA, Irving MH. Selective impairment of glucose storage in
human sepsis. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 813-821.
25. Moore FA, Feliciano DV, Andrassy RJ, McArdle AH, Booth FVM, Morgenstein-Wagner
TB, et al. Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic
complications: the result of a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1992; 216: 172-183.
26. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al.
Intensive insulin therapy in the surgical intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1359-
1367.
27. Heyland DK, Novak F, Drover JW, Jain M, Su X, Suchner U. Should immunonutrition
become routine in critically ill patients? JAMA 2001; 286: 944-953.
28. Griffiths RD, Jones C, Palmer TEA. Six-month outcome of critically ill patients given
glutamine-supplemented parenteral nutrition. Nutrition 1997; 13: 295-302
To register fill in the registration form and send it off complete with a cheque to pay for your course.
Course Fee: £240
Mr J HartleyConsultant SurgeonAcademic Surgical UnitCastle Hill HospitalCottinghamEast YorkshireHU16 5JQ